Ohio Supreme Court· 7/26/1995

State v. Carter

Citations

72 Ohio St. 3d 545
651 N.E.2d 965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that any error in allowing a co-conspirator's hearsay statement for lack of independent proof of the conspiracy prior to admission of the hearsay statement may be harmless
“Strategic trial decisions are left to the deference of the trial counsel and are not to be second-guessed by appellate courts.”
where Lawrence App. No. 25CA24 18 remarks fall into a nonassertive category, witness could properly testify as to the fact that another witness made them
“[Bjecause a true question or inquiry is by its nature incapable of being proved either true or false and cannot be offered ‘to prove the truth of the matter asserted,’ it does not constitute hearsay[.]”
ineffective assistance claim requires (1) deficient performance Case No. 25 MO 0007 – 25 – with strong presumption in favor of counsel without second-guessing strategic decisions and (2) prejudice rendering the result unreliable or the proceeding fundamentally unfair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

683 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Carter

1,030 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.