Ohio Supreme Court· 8/2/2006

State v. Roberts

Citations

110 Ohio St. 3d 71
850 N.E.2d 1168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when de novo review is conducted and that review is not affected by the ex parte communication, then the due-process violation is harmless
rejecting claim that taking of car from victim to escape and then abandoning it was not theft
reaching the merits of the claim without discussing procedural default
reaching the merits of the claim without discussing procedural default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

278 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Roberts

597 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.