Tennessee Supreme Court· 4/17/2000

State v. Carter

Citations

16 S.W.3d 762
2000 Tenn. LEXIS 195
2000 WL 382104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “questions regarding witness credibility, the weight and value of the evidence, and resolution of conflicts in the evidence are matters entrusted to the trial judge as the trier of fact”
stating that proof that a defendant was made aware of his Miranda rights, although not conclusive, weighed in favor of the admission of a confession into evidence
stating that proof that a defendant was made aware of his Miranda rights, although not conclusive, weighed in favor of the admission of a confession into evidence
stating that proof that a defendant was made aware of his Miranda rights, although not conclusive, weighed in favor of the admission of a confession into evidence
noting that Tennessee has not adopted a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) and declining to address the issue
noting that Tennessee has never recognized the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule that was adopted by the Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Anderson, Drowota, Holder, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

222 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.