Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 116 Ohio St. 3d 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecutor permissibly referred to a hypothetical which the prosecutor used in voir dire, where the reference in summation was “a means of explaining that the jury should give little weight to [the defendant’s disadvantaged] background”
  • holding that the prosecutor permissibly referred to a hypothetical which the prosecutor used in voir dire, where the reference in summation was \a means of explaining that the jury should give little weight to {the defendant's disadvantaged] background\
  • prosecutor may legitimately refer to nature and circumstances to explain why aggravation outweighs mitigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

304 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

134 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.