Tennessee Supreme Court· 12/19/2003

State v. Carter

Citations

121 S.W.3d 579
2003 Tenn. LEXIS 1204
2003 WL 22989017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant is entitled to a Range I sentence where the notice seeking enhanced punishment is invalid
holding that “the notice of intent to seek enhanced sentencing” was sufficient as to defendant’s possession charge
concluding that notice from original indictment was adequate as to offense for which the defendant was re-indicted, but that there was no notice given regarding the two new offenses which the superseding indictment charged
stating that “if notice is filed late or is filed timely but is otherwise defective, the defendant must show prejudice before the notice will be rendered ineffective”
“[A]n indictment which references the statute defining the offense is sufficient and satisfies the constitutional and statutory requirements of Hill.”
“[A]n indictment which references the statute defining the offense is sufficient and satisfies the constitutional and statutory requirements of Hill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.