Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 7/26/1995

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 1995 Ohio 104
  • 72 Ohio St. 3d 545

Syllabus

Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when—Trial court has discretion to determine its response to jury's request for further instruction or clarification of previously given instructions—True question does not constitute \hearsay\ as defined by Evid.R. 801—Statement of co-conspirator admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 801(D)(2)(e), when—Confession to police by one co-conspirator implicating a second co-conspirator is not made \during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy\ within the scope of Evid.R. 801(D)(2)(e).

Judges: Moyer, C.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.