Arizona Supreme Court· 5/21/1985

State v. Carter

Citations

700 P.2d 488
145 Ariz. 101
1985 Ariz. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding interrogation at police station for approximately one hour before Miranda warnings were provided did not amount to custody or coercive environment
[A]dmission of an accused’s spontaneous, voluntary statement that is not made in response to police interrogation does not violate the defendant’s Miranda rights.”
“Merely innocent or negligent mistakes . . . will not satisfy the first prong of the Franks test.”
“If a person is subjected to custodial interrogation and indicates a desire that interrogation cease or otherwise invokes his right to remain silent, this decision must be scrupulously honored by the police.”
defining the standard for reckless disregard for the truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.