Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 5/10/1989

State v. Bradley

Citations

  • 42 Ohio St. 3d 136
  • 538 N.E.2d 373
  • 1989 Ohio LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a conviction may be reversed on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel only upon proof of an outcome-determinative deficiency in counsel’s performance
  • holding that counsel’s “tactical decisions” do not “rise to the level of ineffective assistance”
  • holding that an ineffective-assistance-0f-counsel claim requires proof of an outcome-determinative deficiency in counsel’s performance
  • holding that counsel's “tactical decisions” do not “rise to the level of ineffective assistance”
  • noting that it was not always necessary to engage in an analysis of counsel’s ineffective and the prejudicial impact of any of counsel’s errors
  • warning that the purpose of an ineffectiveness claim is not to grade counsel's performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3,391 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Bradley

341 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.