Ohio Supreme Court· 12/20/1984

State v. Maurer

Citations

15 Ohio St. 3d 239
473 N.E.2d 768
15 Ohio B. 379
1984 Ohio LEXIS 1285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the first step in a hearsay analysis is to determine whether the evidence contains an out-of-court statement
stating that a defendant who expresses satisfaction with an impaneled jury may not later claim that he did not receive a fair and impartial jury
requiring a party to seek the introduction of evidence at trial in order to properly preserve it for appeal
describing a trial court’s broad discretion under Evid.R. 403 in the admission of photographs
stating that \illustrative photographs are generally admissible\
\it is non-hearsay if an out-of-court statement is offered to prove a statement was made and not for its truth\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Syllabus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

659 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Maurer

22 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.