Montana Supreme Court· 4/5/2005
State v. Carter
Citations
- 2005 MT 87
- 326 Mont. 427
- 114 P.3d 1001
- 2005 Mont. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “certification reports are nontestimonial in nature in that they are foundational, rather than substantive or accusatory”
- defendant’s confrontation right was not implicated by use of certification reports to demonstrate that In-toxilyzer 5000 was working properly, even though authors of the reports were not present to testify and be confronted
- defendant's confrontation right was not implicated by use of certification reports to demonstrate that Intoxilyzer 5000 was working properly, even though authors of the reports were not present to testify and be confronted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Leaphart, Warner, Cotter, Rice, Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-01-17· cited 124×
- Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 2013-11-25· cited 103×
- People v. PealerNew York Court of Appeals· 2013-02-19· cited 98×
- State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court· 2006-01-11· cited 72×
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
- People v. LonsbyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-12-27· cited 58×
- Compan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-10-03· cited 54×
- Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-09-12· cited 46×
- Bohsancurt v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-05-24· cited 40×
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 38×
- Jarrell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-24· cited 33×
- State v. Rusty RussellMontana Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 26×
- Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court· 2010-07-28· cited 26×
- State v. O'MALEYSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-05· cited 26×
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-08-30· cited 25×
- Ramirez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-28· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. WaltherKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 23×
- Wimbish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-04-08· cited 17×
- State v. J. StrizichMontana Supreme Court· 2021-11-30· cited 16×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court· 1996-04-16· cited 233×
- State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court· 2001-03-01· cited 136×
- State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court· 2004-03-10· cited 57×
- State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 51×
- Kudrna v. Comet Corp.Montana Supreme Court· 1977-11-23· cited 50×
- Cottrill v. Cottrill Sodding ServiceMontana Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 48×
- Price v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court· 1896-03-03· cited 42×
- State v. WhitehornMontana Supreme Court· 2002-03-26· cited 38×
- Pickens v. Shelton-ThompsonMontana Supreme Court· 2000-05-23· cited 36×
- Total Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning v. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISIONMontana Supreme Court· 2002-03-26· cited 35×
- Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 31×
- State v. HardyMontana Supreme Court· 1980-01-03· cited 28×
- State v. DelaneyMontana Supreme Court· 1999-12-20· cited 26×
- State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court· 2001-08-14· cited 25×
- Hayes v. Lame Deer High School DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 2000-12-19· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.