Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 2005 MT 87
  • 326 Mont. 427
  • 114 P.3d 1001
  • 2005 Mont. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “certification reports are nontestimonial in nature in that they are foundational, rather than substantive or accusatory”
  • defendant’s confrontation right was not implicated by use of certification reports to demonstrate that In-toxilyzer 5000 was working properly, even though authors of the reports were not present to testify and be confronted
  • defendant's confrontation right was not implicated by use of certification reports to demonstrate that Intoxilyzer 5000 was working properly, even though authors of the reports were not present to testify and be confronted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Leaphart, Warner, Cotter, Rice, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.