Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/2/1994
State v. Carter
Citations
- 524 N.W.2d 763
- 246 Neb. 953
- 1994 Neb. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaffirming use of Frye test in Nebraska despite U.S. Supreme Court’s modification of test in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993)
- excluding DQA test results on ground that statistical evidence and analysis flawed
- clarified by State v. Freeman, 253 Neb. 385, 571 N.W.2d 276, 293 (1997)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-08· cited 1,699×
- Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 492×
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 279×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-05-05· cited 226×
- United States v. Reginald Pierre Beasley, United States of America v. Oliver Lawrence BeasleyEighth Circuit· 1997-01-22· cited 141×
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 132×
- State v. SanchezNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-07-16· cited 131×
- State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 121×
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
- State v. ValverdeNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-07-19· cited 98×
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-17· cited 86×
- State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-02-16· cited 82×
- State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 80×
- State v. PortscheNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-03· cited 70×
- State v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-10-25· cited 69×
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-10-20· cited 60×
- Leaf v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1999-03-24· cited 52×
- State v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-03-03· cited 49×
- People v. CoyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-01-10· cited 48×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 736×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 320×
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzSecond Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 280×
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 207×
- United States v. Daniel Joe ChischillyNinth Circuit· 1994-07-25· cited 169×
- State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-29· cited 144×
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
- Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-24· cited 124×
- State v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-03-18· cited 122×
- Polk v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 93×
- People v. BarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-08-05· cited 93×
- State v. BoppreNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-03-30· cited 83×
- United States v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-22· cited 78×
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-11-20· cited 75×
- State v. PerrigoNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-21· cited 73×
- State v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 72×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.