Supreme Court· 12/9/1975

Michigan v. Mosley

Citations

423 U.S. 96
96 S. Ct. 321
46 L. Ed. 2d 313
1975 U.S. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that interrogation on unrelated subjects is permissible after invocation of the right to silence
holding that the procedural safeguards triggered by a request to remain silent and a request for an attorney are distinguishable
holding that the procedural safeguards triggered by a request to remain silent and a request for an attorney are distinguishable
holding that the accused understood the Miranda warnings after he orally acknowledged his understanding and signed a printed notification-of-rights form
recognizing that “an accused may selectively assert his right to silence” by agreeing to answer some questions and not others
holding that the admissibility of statements obtained after the person in custody has decided to remain silent depends under Miranda on whether the person’s right to cut off questioning was scrupulously honored

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Brennan, Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Stewart, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,744 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Michigan v. Mosley

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.