Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 14 P.3d 1138
  • 270 Kan. 426
  • 2000 Kan. LEXIS 991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial coun- seis pursuit of guilt-based defense despite client’s contrary wishes ineffective, prejudicial per se
  • remand for hearing serves no purpose when record adequate to decide ineffective assistance issue
  • remand would serve no purpose where assessment by trial court unnecessary because record on appeal sufficiently complete for appellate court to decide issue
  • victim's father's testimony immaterial and inflammatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.