Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 426 A.2d 501
  • 85 N.J. 300
  • 1981 N.J. LEXIS 1593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for reconsideration of whether newly discovered polygraph evidence required reversal of murder convictions and retrial
  • remanding for reconsideration of whether newly discovered polygraph evidence required reversal of murder convictions and retrial
  • delineating a three-factor test for courts to utilize in analyzing motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence
  • delineating a three-factor test for courts to utilize in analyzing motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence
  • setting forth the guidelines for when newly discovered evidence entitles a defendant to a new trial
  • providing for newly discovered evidence to warrant a new trial, a defendant must show that: (1) the evidence is material and not merely cumulative, impeaching, or contradictory; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.