Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 896 S.W.2d 119
  • 1995 Tenn. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 33’s thirteenth juror provision “is mandatory and requires a trial judge to act as the thirteenth juror”
  • concluding that this Court may reverse the trial court’s judgment only if the record contains statements by the trial court indicating disagreement or dissatisfaction with the jury’s verdict
  • holding that Rule 33 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure imposes a mandatory duty upon a trial judge to serve as the thirteenth juror in every criminal case
  • holding that the trial court has a duty to serve as the thirteenth juror
  • holding that the trial court has a duty to serve as the thirteenth juror
  • holding that the trial court has a duty to serve as the thirteenth juror

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Drowota, Reid, Fones, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.