Tennessee Supreme Court· 3/18/2005

State v. Carter

Citations

160 S.W.3d 526
2005 Tenn. LEXIS 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that police “created exigent circumstances by approaching the defendants’ residence and alerting the defendants to the[ir] presence”
holding that police “created the exigent circumstances by approaching the defendants’ residence and alerting the defendants to the[ir] presence”
concluding that the evidence was admissible despite an illegal search because the affidavit supporting the subsequent warrant did not refer to the initial illegal entry
recognizing that while the exclusionary rule may bar the admission of evidence directly or indirectly obtained from an unconstitutional search or seizure, “the exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtaining by means independent of the constitutional violation”
stating that evidence discovered in an unlawful search is not subject to suppression if it is later discovered upon execution of a valid warrant
applying the independent source doctrine and concluding that the exclusionary rule did not require suppression of the illegally seized evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.