Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 114 S.W.3d 895
  • 2003 Tenn. LEXIS 843
  • 2003 WL 22146113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that ―the anticipation of physical harm to oneself is torturous‖
  • recognizing that ―the anticipation of physical harm to oneself is torturous‖
  • concluding there was no error in admitting photographs of the deceased victims at the crime scene during capital sentencing
  • noting that, under the statute, “any evidence relevant to the circumstances of the murder, the aggravating circumstances relied upon by the State, or the mitigating circumstances is admissible if such evidence has probative value in the determination of punishment”
  • reaffirming Dellinger and rejecting the claim that Ring requires aggravating circumstances be included in the indictment
  • applying Dellinger to reject a claim that Ring requires aggravating circumstances be included in the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.