Ohio Supreme Court· 4/20/1994

State v. Carter

Citations

69 Ohio St. 3d 57
630 N.E.2d 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a police officer’s inarticulate hunch will not provide a sufficient basis for an investigative stop
concluding a police “officer's inarticulate hunch will not provide a sufficient basis for an investigative stop”
concluding a police “officer's inarticulate hunch will not provide a sufficient basis for an investigative stop”
concluding a police “officer's inarticulate hunch will not provide a sufficient basis for an investigative stop”
finding that high crime area alone was not sufficient to warrant investigative stop, and noting that “[t]o hold otherwise would result in the wholesale loss of personal liberty of those with the misfortune of living in high crime areas”
finding that high crime area alone was not sufficient to warrant investigative stop, and noting that \[t]o hold otherwise would result in the wholesale loss of personal liberty of those with the misfortune of living in high crime areas\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Grady, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wolff, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.