Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/19/1986

Thomas v. State

Citations

723 S.W.2d 696
1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that consent to breath test is not voluntary if induced by physical force or mental coercion
recognizing that consent to breath test is not voluntary if induced by physical force or mental coercion
recognizing that consent to breath test is not voluntary if induced by physical force or mental coercion
holding that a point of error on appeal must comport with objection made at trial
holding that a defendant has not preserved error for review when the objection on appeal differs from the complaint made to the trial court
recognizing that consent to breath test is not voluntary if induced by physical force or mental coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Teague, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

463 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Thomas v. State

2,471 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.