Skip to main content

Turner v. State

Citations

  • 805 S.W.2d 423
  • 1991 WL 7993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant failed to preserve error when he obtained all relief requested from the trial court and did not pursue his complaint to an adverse ruling
  • stating that ―[t]o preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must make a timely, specific objection. The objection must be made at the earliest possible opportunity.‖
  • stating that “[t]o preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must make a timely, specific objection. The objection must be made at the earliest possible opportunity.”
  • stating that ―[t]o preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must make a timely, specific objection. The objection must be made at the earliest possible opportunity.‖
  • requiring a contemporaneous objection to conduct occurring at voir dire to preserve the complaint for review
  • requiring a contemporaneous objection to conduct occurring at voir dire to preserve the complaint for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Teague, Baird, Maloney, McCormick, Campbell, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

489 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Turner v. State

990 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.