Skip to main content

Garcia v. State

Citations

  • 887 S.W.2d 862
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 44
  • 1994 WL 124308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that sound trial strategy may consist of failing to request a limiting instruction in order to avoid bringing more attention to the evidence in question
  • recognizing that sound trial strategy may consist of failing to request a limiting instruction in order to avoid bringing more attention to the evidence in question
  • holding that trial counsel’s failure to request a limiting instruction did not constitute ineffective assistance because counsel did not want to draw more attention to the incriminating evidence
  • holding that a decision not to request a limiting instruction was a matter of trial strategy because it may \draw more attention to incriminating evidence\
  • holding that once evidence is received without limiting instruction, it becomes part of general evidence and may be used for all purposes
  • holding that no error was preserved when appellant did not object to the State’s alleged comment during closing argument on appellant’s failure to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Overstreet, Baird, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

319 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.