Skip to main content

Bartlett v. State

Citations

  • 270 S.W.3d 147
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1445
  • 2008 WL 5047703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant’s refusal to submit to breath test is relevant to prove intoxication because it “tends to show consciousness of guilt”
  • recognizing that the defendant’s refusal to submit to a breath test is relevant to show consciousness of guilt
  • concluding that evidence of refusal to submit to breath test is relevant in DWI case as it “tends to show consciousness of guilt”
  • concluding that evidence of refusal to submit to breath test is relevant in DWI case as it \tends to show consciousness of guilt\
  • concluding that evidence of refusal to submit to breath test is relevant in DWI case as it “tends to show consciousness of guilt”
  • recognizing defendant’s refusal to submit to breath test is relevant to show consciousness of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

261 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bartlett v. State

46 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.