Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 485 S.E.2d 783
  • 268 Ga. 135
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2026
  • 1997 Ga. LEXIS 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that, for the admission of co-defendant's statements to constitute a Bruton violation, the statements standing alone must clearly inculpate the defendant
  • reiterating that, for the admission of co-defendant’s statements to constitute a Bruton violation, the statements standing alone must clearly inculpate the defendant
  • “the mere fact that there was no written waiver of Miranda rights or other written record of such waiver did not render his statement inadmissible”
  • “[i]n the absence of contrary evidence, defense counsel’s actions are presumed to be part of trial strategy’
  • “For the admission of a co-defendant’s statements to constitute a Bruton violation the statements standing alone must clearly inculpate the defendant.”
  • no Bruton violation when co-defendant’s statement, that Thomas had bought gun later determined to be murder weapon, did not clearly inculpate defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.