Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 71 S.W.3d 346
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 55
  • 2002 WL 429222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant did not preserve error because of failure to make timely objection at trial and failure to make objection on appeal consistent with any made at trial
  • stating that to preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must make a specific objection and obtain a ruling on it
  • admonishing that for error to be preserved, the appellant’s “point of error on appeal must comport with the objection made at trial”
  • holding failure to timely object to testimony waived issue on appeal
  • stating, \the point of error on appeal must comport with the objection made at trial.\
  • to preserve error for appellate review, complaining party must make specific objection and obtain ruling on objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

769 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wilson v. State

2,051 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.