Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 748 So. 2d 970
  • 1999 WL 777439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing \that a trial court should not couch an instruction to a jury or otherwise act in any way that would appear to coerce any juror to reach a hasty decision or to abandon a conscientious belief in order to achieve a unanimous position\
  • upholding the trial court’s admission of flight evidence because the flight from police occurred in the same city as the murder and only eleven days after the murder
  • referring to the inquiry as whether the police employed an inherently suggestive procedure
  • affirming the denial of a motion for mistrial where the Witness “suffered an emotional breakdown after the State asked her to identify the defendants at trial by standing next to them”
  • finding no abuse of discretion in failing to grant a mistrial after a friend of the victim suffered an emotional breakdown when asked to identify an accused while testifying in front of a jury
  • photographic lineup not unnecessarily suggestive where officer did not suggest which photograph witness should pick

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.