Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 811 P.2d 1337
  • 1991 WL 78886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘in light of the witness’ inability to identify [the defen- dant] . . . the testimony concerning the [defendant’s] tattoo must be considered relevant evidence’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lane, Johnson, Parks, Lumpkin, Brett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.