Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/8/1976

Thomas v. State

Citations

353 A.2d 240
277 Md. 257
1976 Md. LEXIS 966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “[ujnder the Blockburger required evidence test, the same evidence necessary to convict on ... [a Maryland Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Vol, 1975 Cum.Supp.
pointing out that \the provisions of [the statute] are in the disjunctive. The offense can be established either by showing\ one type of proscribed conduct or the other
pointing out that “the provisions of [the statute] are in the disjunctive. The offense can be established either by showing” one type of proscribed conduct or the other
“Whatever the sequence may be, the [Double Jeopardy Clause of the] Fifth Amendment forbids successive prosecution and cumulative punishment for a greater and lesser included offense”
“But it should be noted that the provisions of [the statute] are in the disjunctive.”
“But it should be noted that the provisions of [the statute] are in the disjunctive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.