Ethington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when counsel objects to certain inadmissible testimony, but then permits similar evidence to come in without objection, any error is deemed harmless
• holding that appellant did not preserve error because he did not object to the witness‘s continued detailed testimony regarding extraneous robbery
• holding that party is required to continue to object each time inadmissible evidence is offered in order to preserve error
• holding that one objection was insufficient to preserve error for the following “three pages of questions and answers on the subject”
• holding that appellant did not preserve error because he did not object to the witness’s continued detailed testimony regarding extraneous robbery
• holding that when trial court hears and overrules objections to evidence outside hearing of jury, those objections need not be made again in front of jury when evidence is actually presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).