Skip to main content

Almanza v. State

Citations

  • 686 S.W.2d 157
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant must show erroneous charge caused egregious harm preventing fair and impartial trial
  • holding that appellant must show erroneous charge caused egregious harm preventing fair and impartial trial
  • holding that “an error which has been properly preserved by objection will call for reversal as long as the error is not harmless”
  • holding that in absence of request or objection, jury charge error does not require reversal unless “egregious harm” is established
  • holding that if error is found in jury charge and defendant fails to object to such error, defendant must show egregious harm
  • holding that when there is no objection at trial, reversal is required if appellant shows egregious harm resulted from error in the jury charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, Onion, Teague, Davis, McCormick, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5,013 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Almanza v. State

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.