Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/20/1977
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 550 S.W.2d 64
- 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant bears the burden of showing adequate cause for the appointment of a different attorney
- discussing impropriety of substituting retained counsel for appointed counsel for purposes of delaying administration of justice
- “The defendant must accept counsel assigned by the court unless he effectively waives right to counsel in order to represent himself, or can show adequate cause for appointment of a different attorney .”
- “the attorney who represents a criminal defendant is bound by professional duty to present all available evidence and arguments in support of the client’s positions and to contest with vigor all adverse evidence and views.”
- noting presumption against waiver of Constitutional right to counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Onion, Odom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
125 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 683×
- Buntion v. HarmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-15· cited 239×
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 196×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-16· cited 194×
- Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-31· cited 157×
- Geeslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-07· cited 90×
- Long v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-07-06· cited 86×
- Watkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2011-04-13· cited 78×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-10-11· cited 59×
- Fowlkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-10· cited 58×
- Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-08-07· cited 55×
- Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 54×
- Rivera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-03-11· cited 53×
- Burks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1990-09-19· cited 51×
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-09-21· cited 51×
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-04· cited 50×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-11-21· cited 48×
- Trammell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-05-07· cited 45×
- DeGroot v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-08-03· cited 44×
- Riggall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 41×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-25· cited 405×
- Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-16· cited 134×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-05· cited 62×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-04· cited 60×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-27· cited 49×
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-17· cited 42×
- Ex Parte AutenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-10-07· cited 39×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-14· cited 30×
- Viges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-17· cited 27×
- Ex Parte HerrinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-19· cited 26×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-10· cited 16×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.