Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 638 S.W.2d 481
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutorial unsupported-by-the-record comment on defendant's lack of remorse may be impermissible comment on defendant's failure to testify
  • prosecutorial unsupported-by-the-record comment on defendant’s lack of remorse may be impermissible comment on defendant's failure to testify
  • A [The prosecutor = s] language literally indicted others than appellant individually and personally. @
  • “testimony of third persons that an accused has expressed contrition is not ‘legally admissible’ evidence in mitigation when offered by an accused”
  • \testimony of third persons that an accused has expressed contrition is not 'legally admissible' evidence in mitigation when offered by an accused\
  • prosecutorial unsupported-by-the-record comment on defendant's lack of remorse may be impermissible comment on defendant's failure to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Davis, Roberts, Teague, Tom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.