Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/4/1995

Broxton v. State

Citations

909 S.W.2d 912
1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 95
1995 WL 579732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that objection must be specific enough to apprise the trial court as to the nature of the objection
concluding that objection must be specific enough to apprise the trial court as to the nature of the objection
holding that the grounds for objection raised on appeal must comport with those raised at trial, otherwise they are waived
concluding that objection must be specific enough to apprise the trial court as to the nature of the objection
noting complaints, even of constitutional magnitude, are waived on appeal if not called to trial court’s attention
reviewing court will not consider errors, even of constitutional magnitude, not called to the trial court's attention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Baird, Clinton, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

589 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Broxton v. State

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.