Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 766 So. 2d 860
  • 1998 WL 560280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that whether the competency hearing was constitutionally inadequate and its results inherently unreliable was procedurally barred pursuant to Rule 32.2(a) (3) and (5), Ala.R.Crim.P.
  • holding that whether the competency hearing was constitutionally inadequate and its results inherently unreliable was procedurally barred pursuant to Rule 32.2(a)(3) and (5), Ala. R. Crim. P.
  • holding that Thomas’s Eighth Amendment claim was procedurally barred under state procedural rules and that as a matter of federal constitutional law, Thomas’s Eighth Amendment claim was without merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

247 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.