Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 947 S.W.2d 240
  • 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 43
  • 1997 WL 292676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the purpose of an investigative detention regarding driving while intoxicated was effectuated when the officers determined that the suspect was not intoxicated
  • recognizing that officers' continued detention of appellant because he did not look like someone on a business trip was not based on articulable facts giving rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
  • recognizing that officers’ continued detention of appellant because he did not look like someone on a business trip was not based on articulable facts giving rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
  • holding that the purpose of an investigative detention regarding driving while intoxicated was effectuated when the officers determined that the suspect was not intoxicated
  • holding that after officers determined that driver was not intoxicated, continued detention of driver and search of his car without his consent was unreasonable where not supported by reasonable suspicion of other criminal activity
  • holding that after officers determined that driver was not intoxicated, continued detention of driver and search of his car without his consent was unreasonable where not supported by reasonable suspicion of other criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Mansfield, Keller, Meyers, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

922 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Davis v. State

3,205 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.