Skip to main content

Powell v. State

Citations

  • 5 S.W.3d 369
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 8242
  • 1999 WL 997584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that cross-examiner’s questions do not create conflicts in the evidence but witness’s answers to those questions might, and relying on videotape of stop as creating an issue of fact
  • explaining that cross-examiner’s questions do not create conflicts in the evidence but witness’s answers to those questions might, and relying on videotape of stop as creating an issue of fact
  • officer’s continued detention after warning issued was not a fishing expedition because it was based on officer’s reasonable suspicion developed before warning was issued
  • officer was justified in post-citation questioning because he had developed reasonable suspicion and was confirming inconsistency
  • subsequent extraneous drug possession offense tended to make more probable allegation that appellant intended to deliver drugs in charged offense
  • subsequent extraneous drug possession offense tended to make more probable allegation that appellant intended to deliver drugs in charged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

202 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.