Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 11/4/1999
Powell v. State
Citations
- 5 S.W.3d 369
- 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 8242
- 1999 WL 997584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that cross-examiner’s questions do not create conflicts in the evidence but witness’s answers to those questions might, and relying on videotape of stop as creating an issue of fact
- explaining that cross-examiner’s questions do not create conflicts in the evidence but witness’s answers to those questions might, and relying on videotape of stop as creating an issue of fact
- officer’s continued detention after warning issued was not a fishing expedition because it was based on officer’s reasonable suspicion developed before warning was issued
- officer was justified in post-citation questioning because he had developed reasonable suspicion and was confirming inconsistency
- subsequent extraneous drug possession offense tended to make more probable allegation that appellant intended to deliver drugs in charged offense
- subsequent extraneous drug possession offense tended to make more probable allegation that appellant intended to deliver drugs in charged offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
202 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- De La Paz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-03-25· cited 1,229×
- State v. ElkinsTennessee Supreme Court· 2003-04-29· cited 383×
- McQuarters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-09-20· cited 283×
- Simpson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-10-05· cited 151×
- Willis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-05-10· cited 149×
- Haas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-08-03· cited 141×
- Zervos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-02-29· cited 132×
- Goudeau v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-09· cited 106×
- Coleman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-04-05· cited 102×
- Graves v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-02-24· cited 94×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-01-10· cited 89×
- Vargas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-04-19· cited 88×
- Leming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-04-13· cited 83×
- Sims v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-21· cited 73×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-03-31· cited 71×
- State v. VASQUEZ-ARENIVARNebraska Court of Appeals· 2010-02-16· cited 69×
- State v. CardenasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-02-01· cited 66×
- Sieffert v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-06-02· cited 66×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-12-10· cited 59×
- Bass v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-12-21· cited 54×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 2,504×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Villarreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-20· cited 1,246×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-04· cited 1,223×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-05· cited 905×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-01· cited 541×
- Loserth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-02-25· cited 529×
- United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerFifth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 480×
- Hernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-12-17· cited 281×
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 259×
- Crockett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-06· cited 254×
- McVickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-12-01· cited 233×
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-05-17· cited 220×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.