Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 329 S.W.3d 798
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1207
  • 2010 WL 3766661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that error in the admission of evidence is cured where the same evidence comes in elsewhere without objection
  • stating that trial court must be satisfied that three conditions are met before admitting expert testimony under Rule 702: (1) witness is qualified as expert by reason of knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education; (2
  • noting that appellate courts review evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion
  • evidence of constitutionally protected conduct may be admissible if it shown to be relevant to issues involved in case
  • “Because appellant bases his single point of error on more than one legal theory, his entire point of error is multifarious.”
  • “Because appellant bases his single point of error on more than one legal theory, his entire point of error is multifarious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Keasler, Meyers, Price, Womack, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

565 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.