Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/16/2010
Davis v. State
Citations
- 313 S.W.3d 317
- 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 723
- 2010 WL 2382567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Confrontation Clause complaints subject to general error-preservation requirements
- defendant’s statement during police interview, “I should have an attorney” did not expressly invoke the right to counsel
- detective had sufficient expertise to give an expert opinion, based on his experience as an officer, on whether same knife was used to inflict wounds on the victim and a cat
- “personal moral culpability,” “moral blameworthiness,” and “probability” need not be defined
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Price, Johnson, Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
370 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 848×
- Nava, Andres MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-12-18· cited 526×
- Tillman, Larry Joseph Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-10-05· cited 430×
- Rhomer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-01-30· cited 245×
- Pawlak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-09-18· cited 197×
- Colone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-05-08· cited 146×
- Morales, Jose ManuelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-09· cited 122×
- Aekins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-10-22· cited 101×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-07· cited 92×
- Cardenas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-11-10· cited 82×
- Raymond Merril Jessop v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-04-19· cited 81×
- State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court· 2017-04-04· cited 78×
- Robert Cruz Lozano v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-01-26· cited 77×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-28· cited 69×
- Jose Isaas Herrera AKA Jose Isaas Herrera, Sr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-04-17· cited 52×
- Bryant v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-04-06· cited 51×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-06-15· cited 45×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-30· cited 42×
- Saenz, Kimberly ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-12-10· cited 35×
- State v. PurcellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-03-29· cited 31×
Cites
83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 1,995×
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-06· cited 1,900×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
- Solomon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-20· cited 1,266×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-05· cited 911×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.