Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 313 S.W.3d 317
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 723
  • 2010 WL 2382567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Confrontation Clause complaints subject to general error-preservation requirements
  • defendant’s statement during police interview, “I should have an attorney” did not expressly invoke the right to counsel
  • detective had sufficient expertise to give an expert opinion, based on his experience as an officer, on whether same knife was used to inflict wounds on the victim and a cat
  • “personal moral culpability,” “moral blameworthiness,” and “probability” need not be defined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Price, Johnson, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

370 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.