Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 770 N.E.2d 319
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 558
  • 2002 WL 1376147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court’s decision on a request to withdraw a guilty plea is presumptively valid, and a party appealing an adverse decision must prove that the court has abused its discretion
  • holding that a trial court’s decision on a request to withdraw a guilty plea is presumptively valid, and a party appealing an adverse decision must prove that the court has abused its discretion
  • holding that a trial court’s decision on a request to withdraw a guilty plea is presumptively valid, and a party appealing an adverse decision must prove that the court has abused its discretion
  • concluding the defendant suffered no prejudice where the juror heard rumor the defendant's family made bomb threats against the courthouse
  • concluding the defendant suffered no prejudice where the juror heard rumor the defendant’s family made bomb threats against the courthouse
  • noting that opening an unlocked door constitutes a breaking for purposes of burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.