Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/13/2006
Davis v. State
Citations
- 202 S.W.3d 149
- 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1688
- 2006 WL 2620047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that affidavit supported probable cause because police officer specified particular house from which he smelled odor of methamphetamine manufacturing
- concluding that magistrate could reasonably infer that officer was trained, commissioned police officer who, based on past experience, could identify odor generated by cooking methamphetamine
- holding that affidavit supported probable cause because police officer specified particular house from which he smelled odor of methamphetamine manufacturing
- explaining that affidavit does not provide substantial basis when “too many inferences must be drawn”
- explaining that an officer’s statement that he recognized the odor of methamphetamine reasonably implied that he had experience with the odor generated by the process of cooking methamphetamine
- explaining that affidavit does not provide substantial basis when “too many inferences must be drawn”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-01-31· cited 1,369×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-05-09· cited 438×
- Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-09-10· cited 256×
- State of Texas v. Duarte, GilbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-09-12· cited 195×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-03-28· cited 119×
- State v. Cuong Phu LeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-29· cited 112×
- Graves v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-02-24· cited 94×
- Rogers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-06-26· cited 83×
- Crider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-16· cited 65×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-26· cited 60×
- Romo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-08· cited 39×
- Kennedy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-03-11· cited 34×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-06· cited 30×
- State v. GriggsTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-10-25· cited 30×
- Hogan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-11-18· cited 29×
- Wesley Jerome Wright v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-05-09· cited 29×
- Farhat v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-01-06· cited 23×
- Bradley Ray McClintock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-06-11· cited 14×
- Homer Clark Steele v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-08-11· cited 13×
- Frederick Manuel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-05· cited 12×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 821×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-18· cited 400×
- Cassias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-19· cited 326×
- Moulden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-20· cited 125×
- Gish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-17· cited 85×
- Schmidt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-05· cited 82×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.