Supreme Court of Florida· 6/5/1997

Davis v. State

Citations

698 So. 2d 1182
1997 WL 296970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that sole fact that police had warrant for appellant's arrest at the time he went to the police station did not establish that he was in custody
concluding that prosecutor’s reference to defendant’s statements as “bald-faced lies” was not improper
concluding that prosecutor’s reference to defendant’s statements as “bald-faced lies” was not improper
rejecting defendant's argument that this Court's construction of avoid arrest aggravator be incorporated into jury instruction because standard jury instruction was legally adequate
rejecting argument that an avoid-arrest instruction that tracked the statute was legally inadequate because it did not include a comparable special instruction
\[T]he sole fact that police had a warrant for Davis's arrest at the time he went to the station does not conclusively establish that he was in custody.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.