Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 555
  • 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 81
  • 1997 WL 631978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attacks directed at irregularities in orders referring cases to a magistrate are procedural attacks that may render a judgment voidable but not automatically void
  • clarifying that the only issue that is jurisdictional and may be raised on appeal for the first time with regards to a magistrate is the magistrate’s qualification to hold the position of magistrate
  • reversing court of appeals for considering unpreserved error on appeal when trial court did not lack jurisdiction and conviction was not void
  • discussing tendency to confuse jurisdiction of the court with authority of the judge
  • distinguishing between a trial court’s jurisdiction and authority in the context of void and voidable judgments
  • reversing court of appeals for considering unpreserved error on appeal when trial court did not lack jurisdiction and conviction was not void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.