United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that questions during lawful traffic stop which are unrelated to initial stop do not violate Fourth Amendment
• holding that questioning during pendency of computer checks could not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights because the questioning did not extend the duration of the initial, valid seizure
• finding that an officer may lawfully ask questions of traffic-stop detainees while waiting for the results of computer checks
• finding that an officer may lawfully ask questions of traffic-stop detainees while waiting for the results of computer checks
• holding that both driver and passenger-owner possessed drugs found in a hidden compartment
• holding that both driver and passenger-owner possessed drugs found in a hidden compartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).