State of Texas v. Duran, Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial judge was entitled to disbelieve officer’s testimony that he stopped defendant after seeing traffic violation
• holding that appellate courts review “indisputable visual evidence” de novo but defer to trial judge‟s factual finding of whether witness actually saw what was depicted in “indisputable visual evidence”
• stating that appellate courts may review de novo indisputable visual evidence contained in a videotape
• stating that the critical part of the reasonable-suspicion analysis is whether an officer’s action is supported by “specific and articulable facts”
• stating that to reverse a trial court’s finding, there must be “indisputable…evidence” that contradicts the finding
• stating that courts use an objective standard to support a finding of reasonable suspicion or probable cause to determine if a stop is valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).