Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 870 S.W.2d 43
  • 1994 WL 5327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that general notice of appeal did not confer jurisdiction on court of appeals under former rule 40(b)(1)
  • holding that general notice of appeal did not confer jurisdiction on court of appeals under former rule 40(b)(1)
  • holding that the appellant's \general notice\ of appeal under former Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(b)(1) failed to confer jurisdiction on the Court of Appeals
  • holding that general notice of appeal did not confer jurisdiction on court of appeals under former rule 40(b)(1)
  • holding that a “Certification of Service and Presentment” was insufficient to establish that the trial court received actual notice of the defendant’s motion for new trial
  • holding that a “Certification of Service and Presentment” was insufficient to establish that the trial court received actual notice of the defendant’s motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton, Overstreet, Meyers, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

205 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.