Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 177 S.W.3d 355
  • 2005 WL 826087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony by one eyewitness can be legally sufficient
  • holding testimony by one witness can be legally sufficient to support conviction
  • stating “[i]t is well established that a conviction may be based on the testimony of a single eyewitness”
  • stating “conviction may be based on the testimony of a single eyewitness”
  • recognizing the jury’s role in evaluating credibility
  • “We now conclude that the complainant in a criminal prosecution is not a party within the meaning of rule 801(e)(2). . . .

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherry Radack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.