Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 12/12/2011
Davis v. State
Citations
- 268 P.3d 86
- 2011 OK CR 29
- 2011 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
- 2011 WL 6282347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a complaining defendant must establish actual prejudice to succeed on his complaint that spectators wore ribbons
- “The heat of passion must render the mind incapable of forming a design to effect death before the defense of manslaughter is established.”
- “A defendant’s statements concerning the homicide are sufficient to warrant a jury instruction only if those statements are supported by other evidence presented at trial.”
- restating sufficiency of the evidence standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin, That, Winchester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-01-11· cited 103×
- Grant v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2013-08-15· cited 51×
- BENCH v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-10-04· cited 51×
- PULLEN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-08-04· cited 48×
- Hancock v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 48×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-09-06· cited 45×
- Cuesta-Rodriguez v. CarpenterTenth Circuit· 2019-02-22· cited 45×
- BAIRD v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-06-01· cited 37×
- DAVIS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-03-22· cited 37×
- BIVENS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-10-11· cited 28×
- FREDERICK v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-05-25· cited 20×
- HARRIS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-09-26· cited 18×
- STATE v. TUBBYCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-08-03· cited 13×
- NEWMAN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-06-04· cited 13×
- FUSTON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-03-05· cited 11×
- COCHLIN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-12-03· cited 8×
- OLIVER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-08-11· cited 6×
- METOYER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-10-20· cited 6×
- MCCAULEY v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2024-04-04· cited 4×
- VASQUEZ v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2025-01-30· cited 4×
Cites
120 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 1,245×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court· 2009-11-16· cited 732×
- Green v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 672×
- Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 634×
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 596×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.