Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 180
  • 787 S.E.2d 221
  • 2016 WL 3145125
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that any possible deficient performance by counsel in failing to object under Rule 403 did not result in prejudice where the evidence was strong
  • recognizing that an expert may listen to the testimony at trial and use that information to form the basis of his opinions
  • recognizing that any possible deficient performance by counsel in failing to object under Rule 403 did not result in prejudice where the evidence was strong
  • holding that Appel- lant’s ineffective-assistance claim failed because the appellant had not shown a reasonable probability that an objection to the admission of autopsy photos would have changed the outcome of his trial, among other reasons
  • concluding that photographs of victim “attached to various monitors and life support machines” and of “an MRI scan of the victim’s head . . . were relevant to show the nature and extent of the victim’s injuries”
  • noting the importance of advocates recognizing the distinction between the new Evidence Code and the old one and of advocates analyzing and applying the correct law under the new Evidence Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.