Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 983 S.W.2d 867
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 8172
  • 1998 WL 905342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the State failed to offer objective circumstances such as time, location, vehicle movement to justify reasonable suspicion of intoxication
  • holding that State did not show reasonable suspicion based on officer's observation that defendant's car \drifted slightly across a lane marker a single time\
  • stating that violation occurs \only when a vehicle fails to stay within its lane and such movement is not safe or is not made safely\
  • holding traffic stop not justified where officer testified there was nothing unsafe about a lane change where he observed a driver drifting into adjacent lane only one time
  • “drifting” across a lane marker did not establish reasonable suspicion of intoxication; there are a “myriad of reasons” why a person might drift
  • “drifting” across a lane marker did not establish reasonable suspicion of intoxication because there are a “myriad of reasons” why a person might drift

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aboussie, Jones, Yeakel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.