Supreme Court· 6/5/1979
Dunaway v. New York
Citations
- 442 U.S. 200
- 99 S. Ct. 2248
- 60 L. Ed. 2d 824
- 1979 U.S. LEXIS 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an arrest occurred when the defendant was “picked up” and brought in for questioning about a murder
- incriminating statements made within an hour of illegal arrest not sufficiently attenuated
- incriminating statements made within an hour of illegal arrest not sufficiently attenuated
- noting, in a case concerning seizures, that “the requisite ‘balancing’ has been performed in centuries of precedent and is embodied in the principle that seizures are ‘reasonable’ only if supported by probable cause”
- seizure of suspect without probable cause and custodial interrogation in police station violates Fourth Amendment
- even in the absence of a formal arrest, probable cause may be required when detention is indistinguishable from a formal arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, White, Stevens, Rehnquist, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2,468 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
Other cases named Dunaway v. New York
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.