Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 938 S.W.2d 57
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 246
  • 1996 WL 709368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s comment about his oath to seek justice and defense counsel’s lack of oath was “manifestly improper”
  • holding that the argument is considered in light of the record as a whole
  • holding that permissible jury argument includes responding to opposing counsel’s arguments
  • determining that prosecutor = s remarks were outside the record, manifestly improper, and prejudicial, and then conducting a harm analysis.
  • finding the statement \[defense counsel] wishes ... that you turn a guilty man free ... because he doesn't have the obligation to see that justice is done\ was improper
  • collecting cases and noting that where State presented no evidence that prosecutor took oath, argument injected new fact into case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, McCormick, White, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

206 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.